But most importantly I want to designate the following as the foremost one of the numerous questions and is requested which have reference to the axioms: To prove that they are perhaps not inconsistent, that is, you to one amount of analytical methods based upon her or him can be never ever produce contradictory results.

Inside the geometry, new proof the fresh new compatibility of your own axioms will likely be affected from the building the ideal arena of number, such that analogous relationships between your variety of so it industry coincide with the geometrical rules. Any paradox on deductions regarding the geometrical maxims have to with this end up being recognizable about arithmetic of this realm of number. Such as this the desired proof into the compatibility of your own geometrical basics is made to depend upon the theorem of your own being compatible of your arithmetical rules.

The brand new rules from arithmetic try essentially very little else compared to the recognized regulations from computation, with the addition of the latest axiom off continuity. I recently gathered her or him plus in therefore doing changed the axiom from continuity because of the a couple convenient basics, namely, the brand new really-understood axiom away from Archimedes, and you will yet another axiom essentially below: you to definitely numbers form a system off things which is capable of no longer expansion, so long as all other axioms hold (axiom regarding completeness). I’m believing that it must be you can to locate an excellent lead evidence towards being compatible of arithmetical concepts, in the form of a mindful study and you can appropriate modification of your understood methods of reason from the concept of unreasonable numbers.

Showing the necessity of the situation out of other section off see, We add the following observation: If the inconsistent properties getting assigned to an idea, I state, that mathematically the idea cannot exist. Therefore, like, a genuine amount whoever square was -l will not exists statistically. However, if it could be proved that qualities allotted to the idea can’t ever produce a contradiction of the software out-of a limited amount of logical process, I say that new statistical lifestyle of concept (eg, off a number otherwise a features which joins specific criteria) is and thus turned out. In the event ahead of all of us, in which the audience is concerned about the newest principles from genuine numbers within the arithmetic, this new proof of the fresh new being compatible of your own rules was at the newest exact same go out new proof of the latest mathematical existence of the done program off genuine number or of your continuum. The fresh totality away from genuine amounts, i. age., new continuum with respect to the attitude just expressed, is not necessarily the totality of all the you’ll show in the decimal fractions, otherwise of all the you’ll laws and regulations considering that components of a basic sequence can get proceed. I think, the idea of the fresh continuum is exactly logically tenable within this experience merely. It seems to me, in reality, that matches finest also to just what experience and instinct give you. The concept of the brand new continuum if not compared to the computer of all of the characteristics is present, up coming, in exactly the same feel given that system off inbuilt, mental wide variety, like, or given that Cantor’s high kinds out of amounts and you may cardinal amounts. To have I’m convinced that the presence of the second, exactly as that brand new continuum, might be ended up in the same manner I have demonstrated; in the place of the machine of all the cardinal numbers otherwise of all the Cantor s alephs, in which, since are revealed, a system out of concepts, compatible during my feel, can’t be put up. Sometimes of these possibilities try, ergo, considering my terminology, statistically non-existent.

Preencha o formulário abaixo,

será um prazer responder!